Bringing it together…
August 31 , 2010
It seems that in recent years security system manufacturers and software development companies have been working together to provide a streamlined interface for end users. An access control manufacturer’s efforts should obviously be concentrated on card readers and the software for monitoring and control, but through the use of API’s and SDK’s an access control software can be tailored to communicate with say… an IP camera system produced by a completely different manufacturer. The same is true with visitor management systems, burglar alarms, time and attendance systems, and even personnel management systems such as Blackboard, Peoplesoft, Active Directory, and even logical security systems for access to your computer network.
These integrations are usually sold as a means to reduce labor and provide ease of use in finding video, entering cards, etc., however it is my belief is that some integrations are almost necessary. For example, burglar alarms in a class A office space with a large amount of employees are almost always a nuisance and as a result are seldom used to the systems potential. It is bad policy decision to give multiple users the same code to arm and disarm an alarm system for obvious reasons. If one bad apple spoils the bunch, that one code needs to be changed and a new code distributed. Also, the ability for an audit trail is greatly compromised. If everybody has the same code, how could one use reporting to find out who accessed the building after hours and made a mess in the lunch room? There are downfalls in using the alarm keypad to manage this many codes as well. It is undoubtedly a maintenance nightmare.
How does integration with an access control system help?
For starters, all alarm zones can be routed through input points that are managed in the access control software. This allows an intuitive method of bypassing and running reports on field devices such as motion detectors, glassbreak detectors, etc. No more scrolling through a keypad to find out which motion detector caused the false alarm.
Proximity cards can be used to arm and disarm the system. Yes, this offers a degraded level of security because the bad guy could pick up a dropped card in the parking lot and have free reign to the office but these risks can be reduced by using card plus pin (PIN’s managed through the access control software) or biometric verification.
Choke points for entry/exit to your facility can normally be created eliminating the need for multiple keypads. For example, if there are 6 doors into the space each having card readers but the keypad is only at the main entrance, the other 5 card readers can be disabled while the alarm is armed.
Remote administration can be used to verify that the alarm is armed or disarm it for cleaning crews all from home. Many burglar alarms have software packages that can be used to dial into the panel over a POTS line and do some basic administration but I have yet to see one that is even remotely intuitive for the user.
What are your thoughts? Is integration between systems worth a premium?

